Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa's personal astrologer, Sumanadasa Abeygunawardena, once regarded as one of Sri Lanka's most influential behind-the-scenes figures during a powerful political era, appeared before the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) to make a formal statement. The high-profile appearance, which lasted nearly three hours, has drawn significant public attention and reignited discussions about the intersection of political power, personal influence, and alleged financial misconduct in Sri Lanka.
Who Is Sumanadasa Abeygunawardena?
Sumanadasa Abeygunawardena is widely recognized as the personal astrologer of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, one of Sri Lanka's most dominant political figures of the 21st century. During Rajapaksa's presidency, Abeygunawardena was considered a "VVIP" — a very, very important person — owing to his close proximity to the seat of power. Astrologers have historically held considerable cultural and social significance in Sri Lanka, often consulted on matters ranging from personal decisions to major state affairs. Abeygunawardena's access to the former president elevated his status far beyond that of a typical practitioner, making him a notable figure in political circles.
His influence during that period was widely reported, with many observers noting that key decisions — including the timing of political events — were said to be guided in part by astrological counsel. This background makes his current appearance before an anti-corruption body all the more significant and politically charged.
The CIABOC Summons and Statement
Abeygunawardena arrived at the CIABOC premises in the morning after being formally summoned by the commission. He was called to provide a statement in connection with an ongoing investigation linked to the 'Siriliya Saviya' organisation, a body that has come under scrutiny from investigators. After spending close to three hours inside the commission's offices, Abeygunawardena departed without making any detailed public comments about the nature of his statement or the specific questions he was asked to address.
CIABOC, which functions as Sri Lanka's primary anti-corruption watchdog, has been increasingly active in recent years, pursuing cases that involve alleged misuse of public funds, bribery, and corruption across various sectors of government and public life. The summons of such a high-profile individual connected to a former head of state signals the breadth and seriousness of the current investigation.
What Is the 'Siriliya Saviya' Organisation?
The 'Siriliya Saviya' organisation sits at the centre of this investigation. While full details of the probe remain under wraps as the investigation is ongoing, the organisation has attracted the attention of bribery sleuths who are examining its activities and financial dealings. Investigations of this nature typically involve scrutiny of fund collection, disbursement of resources, and whether public money or donations were handled in a legally compliant and transparent manner.
The involvement of a figure as closely associated with political power as Abeygunawardena raises questions about the nature of his role — if any — within the organisation or its related activities. His statement to CIABOC is expected to form part of a broader evidentiary process as investigators piece together a comprehensive picture of the alleged irregularities under examination.
Political Implications of the Investigation
The questioning of individuals closely tied to former President Mahinda Rajapaksa carries significant political weight in Sri Lanka's current climate. The country has been navigating a complex post-economic crisis landscape, and accountability for past governance decisions remains a deeply sensitive and politically charged issue among the public and civil society.
Anti-corruption investigations involving figures from the Rajapaksa era have been a recurring theme in Sri Lankan politics in recent years. Critics of the former administration have long called for greater transparency and accountability, while supporters argue that many such investigations are politically motivated. Regardless of political perspective, the formal involvement of CIABOC lends institutional weight to the current inquiry, suggesting that investigators have gathered sufficient grounds to pursue statements from key individuals.
What Happens Next?
Following the recording of Abeygunawardena's statement, CIABOC investigators are expected to continue their work on the broader case connected to the 'Siriliya Saviya' organisation. Depending on the findings, the commission has the authority to recommend prosecution or take further legal steps against individuals found to have engaged in corrupt practices.
Public interest in the case is likely to remain high given the prominent personalities involved and the historical significance of the Rajapaksa era in Sri Lankan political memory. Legal observers and transparency advocates will be closely watching how CIABOC proceeds, viewing the case as a potential benchmark for accountability in the country.
As Sri Lanka continues its efforts to rebuild public trust in its institutions, investigations such as this one serve as a critical reminder that no individual — regardless of their proximity to power — is beyond the reach of the law. The coming weeks are expected to bring further developments as the investigation progresses.