Wednesday, February 11, 2026

CBK speaks out for Saman Ekanayake, warns govt is dismantling public service

Former President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga (CBK) has issued a stern warning about the systematic dismantling of Sri Lanka's professional public service, expressing strong support for veteran civil servant Saman Ekanayake. Her intervention highlights growing concerns about the erosion of institutional integrity within the country's administrative framework.

CBK's Strong Stand on Public Service Integrity

Kumaratunga's public statement represents a significant political intervention, as the former president rarely comments on current administrative matters. Her decision to speak out specifically for Saman Ekanayake underscores the gravity of the situation facing Sri Lanka's civil service structure.

The former president's concerns center on what she describes as the systematic erosion of professional standards within the public sector. This development comes at a time when Sri Lanka's administrative capacity is crucial for implementing economic recovery programs and maintaining essential government services.

Saman Ekanayake's Role and Significance

Saman Ekanayake, a respected figure in Sri Lanka's civil service, has been at the center of recent administrative controversies. His career spans several decades of public service, during which he has held key positions in various government departments. Ekanayake's experience and institutional knowledge make him a valuable asset to the country's administrative machinery.

The support from CBK suggests that Ekanayake's situation may be symptomatic of broader issues affecting the public service. His case appears to represent the challenges faced by career civil servants who have dedicated their professional lives to serving the nation.

Government Reforms Under Scrutiny

The current government's approach to public service reform has come under increasing scrutiny from various quarters. While administrative efficiency and modernization are essential goals, critics argue that the methods being employed may be undermining the institutional foundations of the civil service.

CBK's warning about the dismantling of public service suggests that the reforms may be going beyond necessary restructuring to potentially damaging the professional ethos that has traditionally guided Sri Lanka's administrative system. This raises questions about the long-term implications for governance and public administration.

Historical Context of Sri Lanka's Public Service

Sri Lanka's civil service has historically been regarded as one of the more professional and competent administrative systems in South Asia. Built on foundations established during the colonial period and refined after independence, the service has traditionally maintained standards of professionalism and political neutrality.

The current concerns about dismantling suggest a departure from these established norms. CBK's intervention draws on her experience as a former president who worked closely with the civil service during her tenure, giving her perspective particular weight in current discussions.

Political Implications and Reactions

The former president's statement carries significant political weight, given her stature in Sri Lankan politics and her role in previous government administrations. Her intervention may influence public opinion about current administrative policies and could potentially impact the government's approach to public service reform.

Political observers note that CBK's decision to speak publicly on this issue suggests deep concern about the direction of current policies. Her support for Ekanayake may also encourage other public service professionals to voice their concerns about ongoing changes.

Impact on Administrative Efficiency

The controversy surrounding public service reforms raises important questions about administrative efficiency and effectiveness. While modernization and reform are necessary for improving government services, the manner of implementation is crucial for maintaining institutional integrity.

Critics argue that dismantling experienced administrative structures without adequate replacement mechanisms could severely impact the government's ability to deliver essential services. This concern is particularly relevant given Sri Lanka's current economic challenges and the need for effective policy implementation.

Future of Sri Lankan Public Service

CBK's warning highlights the need for careful consideration of how public service reforms are implemented. The challenge lies in balancing the need for modernization with the preservation of institutional knowledge and professional standards that have served the country well.

The situation involving Saman Ekanayake and the broader concerns raised by the former president may serve as a catalyst for more comprehensive discussions about the future direction of Sri Lanka's public service. These discussions are essential for ensuring that reforms strengthen rather than weaken the country's administrative capacity.

As Sri Lanka continues to navigate complex economic and political challenges, the role of a professional and effective public service becomes increasingly critical. CBK's intervention serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining institutional integrity while pursuing necessary reforms in the public sector.